Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing how we do many things, including medical writing. If you’re in the healthcare field, you’ve probably noticed how AI tools can help with writing tasks. They make it easier to draft documents, summarize research, and catch errors.
While we still have no moat, there are a few major AI tools out there, and in this post, we’ll compare the most popular ones used in medical writing: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and Bing Chat.
ChatGPT: The Assistant
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is widely recognized for its ability to streamline various writing tasks, making it a popular choice among medical writers.
Its main strength lies in simplifying complex medical information, making it easier to produce clear, patient-friendly documents and technical reports. Many writers rely on the paid version, because it gives access to advanced models with superior context awareness, which is especially useful for drafting detailed and structured documents like medical manuscripts.
Beyond content creation, ChatGPT is also valuable for proofreading, checking grammar, and improving the overall readability of medical texts. This makes it a helpful tool for ensuring that highly technical documents are both accurate and accessible.
However, while it excels at simplifying jargon and enhancing productivity, ChatGPT does have drawbacks. It lacks access to real-time medical data unless plugins or browsing capabilities are used, which can limit its utility for projects requiring the most up-to-date information.
Additionally, it should not be solely relied upon for highly specialized content, such as regulatory documents, where human expertise is crucial to ensure compliance and accuracy. I still need to recheck every single reference it suggests.
Despite these limitations, ChatGPT remains a strong tool for medical writers, enhancing workflow efficiency and supporting both creative and technical tasks.
Gemini: Real-Time Information with Google Power
Gemini, developed by Google DeepMind, stands out for its ability to provide real-time, up-to-date information by leveraging Google’s powerful search engine.
This makes it highly useful for medical writers who need to access the latest research, clinical guidelines, or medical news. Its ability to pull current data directly from Google gives it an edge in fast-evolving fields like healthcare.
Additionally, Gemini integrates smoothly with Google tools such as Docs and Sheets, streamlining collaboration on projects and making it easier to draft and edit documents with teams in real time.
However, as a relatively new tool, Gemini’s availability is still limited, and it may not yet offer the same depth of language processing as more established models like GPT-4.
Grok: The Social Media Expert
Grok, developed by Elon Musk’s XAI, is designed primarily for social media platforms like Twitter (now X).
Its strength lies in quickly generating concise, engaging content such as tweets or short posts about health topics, making it ideal for medical writers focused on marketing or public health communication. Grok’s fast, efficient nature is well-suited for social media environments where brevity and impact are key.
However, its capabilities are limited when it comes to more complex medical writing tasks, such as creating detailed clinical reports or regulatory documents. Grok excels in short-form content, but lacks the depth needed for the longer, highly technical writing that medical professionals often require.
Bing Chat: Free and Integrated with Microsoft
Bing Chat, powered by GPT-4 and developed by Microsoft, offers similar capabilities to ChatGPT but with the added benefit of deep integration into Microsoft’s productivity suite, including Word and Excel.
This makes it especially useful for medical writers who frequently use these tools for drafting, editing, or analyzing data. One of Bing Chat’s standout features is that it’s free to use, offering many of the same advantages as GPT-4 without the premium cost.
Additionally, Bing Chat’s real-time web search capability provides access to the latest medical research, treatments, and studies, making it invaluable for writers who need up-to-date information.
However, while it excels in accessing fresh data, its interaction length can be limited, which may not suit more detailed, long-form writing projects.
Why I Stick with ChatGPT (Paid Version)
Now, with so many options, you might wonder why I choose to stick with ChatGPT’s paid version.
First, it helps me stay focused. Learning and mastering one tool allows me to get the most out of it without feeling overwhelmed by the constant updates and new tools being introduced.
ChatGPT is consistently at the forefront of AI advancements. OpenAI keeps pushing the boundaries of what these models can do, which means I can trust it to handle the evolving demands of medical writing. Plus, juggling too many tools can lead to burnout.
Keeping up with every new AI feature out there would just drain time and energy. By sticking to ChatGPT, I can avoid that and still produce top-notch work.
AI Tools Comparison Table
| Tool | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT (GPT-4) | Versatile; good for long and complex content | Paid version required for advanced features |
| Gemini | Real-time updates; integrates with Google | Limited access; still in early development |
| Grok | Fast; ideal for short-form, social media content | Not suited for long-form medical writing |
| Bing Chat | Free; real-time web search; Microsoft integration | Limited conversation length |
Conclusion
Each of these AI tools has its strengths. But for me, ChatGPT remains the best all-around tool for medical writing, especially for longer, more detailed projects. Its continuous development and focus on delivering high-quality output make it worth the investment. If you’re a medical writer, investing time in mastering one tool—like ChatGPT—can help you work smarter and avoid burnout while staying ahead in the field.